Archive for July, 2008

WELCOME TO THE WIZARD…YOU GO, MISTER!

July 29, 2008

Blessed be…I have found someone who believes me and is willing to join in the blogger battle for publicity for Elsa Newman and her case–as well as for her children and their life with a man against whom they have disclosed virtually unspeakable sexual atrocities, plus an assortment of other abuse.

Here is his site: http://www.blognow.com.au/wizardofoz/94222/   Please check it out. Please pass it on and post it everywhere you can thnk of. If enough people hear this story, we will dare to hope that someone in authority and someone who has power will take action.

The Tearing of a Heart

July 18, 2008

Tugging at a heart is a fun thing only if the heart is a toy and the tuggers are puppies.

Shredding a heart is a fun thing only if the heart is a toy and the shredders are puppies.

But if you are a woman unjustly imprisoned…and if your two precious sons are in the physical custody of a pedophile father, of whom they are terrified…it is no fun at all. In reality, it is absolutely unbearable—and yet it must be borne.

Please keep this latter thought in mind, despite the delightful photo I’ve used to illustrate the thought.

What shall we say of this man?

July 15, 2008

Elsa Newman’s sons visited her this weekend. She sees them once a year, by court order, and this was the time.

I hear that the first visit, on Saturday, went reasonably well. Elsa arrived in the visiting room and set out chairs for herself and the two boys. When they arrived in the company of the father, [an adult is necessary, in order for minors to visit this prison] he forbade the boys to sit until he had retrieved a chair for himself. Then they were permitted to seat themselves. Their chairs were close to Elsa, and she was able to touch them, pat a hand, rub the back of the younger one and write on his back, “I love you.” This latter came from an old game she used to play with them in earlier years and more pleasant settings: she would write a word on their back, and they tried to figure out what she was writing. So the “I love you” was a familiar game to the younger boy. 

At this first visit, the younger boy was chatty and liked touching his mother–hand, arm, kiss or hug, as is quite appropriate for a child of his age. The older boy was quiet until he began to talk…and then he talked and talked and talked, as if he wanted to fit in a year’s worth of conversation. This went on until his father finally turned to him and said, “Will you shut up?” Whereupon the boy did exactly that.

The next day, however, the visit went quite differently. The father and two sons arrived first. This time the visitors arrived in the visiting room before Elsa did. The father had already set up chairs, placing his in such a way that he was sort of between Elsa and the boys. Defeat and despair seemed to show in every line of their bodies. Older boy is tall and strong–a weight lifter, with considerable upper body strength, and he is handsome, but he walked slouched and hunched almost as if broken by something that had happened since the last visit. They could no longer touch their mother…pat her hand…or offer her a kiss on the cheek. And indeed, on this second day of the weekend, they seemed not the be much interested in her. The younger boy would not talk to her–or talked very little. He veered away from his father and seemed to cling to his older brother, as if for safety from the man who sat between him and his mother. The older boy also was quiet.

At one point, Elsa’s younger son, to entertain himself? Or because he was uncomfortable? began to tap on his brother’s thigh, as if playing the piano. Elsa patted her own thigh. “You can play the piano here,” she said. The boy shook his head, as if he dared not come near her.

Then–and this is what caused me to ask the question in the title of this piece–AS though he had grown weary of visitation by court order, the father suddenly stood, an hour before the visit should have ended. “Are you ready to go?” he demanded of the two boys. They did not answer. They remained seated.

“Come on. Let’s go,” said the man. The boys stood obediently and–heads down–trucked after him.

Elsa, helpless, watched them go, deprived of the hour that would have given her even a few more precious memories to strengthen her until she sees them again–in another year.

What shall we say of this man? What kind of man is this–to thus deprive his children’s mother of that single, precious hour? 

In words I think Elsa might have used: “I pray G-d you never have to have visits from your children in prison.”

So Many Questions…Such a Shaky Prosecution Case

July 5, 2008

So many questions!

I’m sitting here at my desk, going over some of my research about the Elsa Newman case. So many things raise questions about both her criminal trials. “Both?” you ask. “You mean she was tried twice?”
 
Yes, I mean she was tried twice. Further, she was tried twice on pretty much the same charges. The only exception I know of was the addition of a death penalty possibility in the second trial.
 
Aha! And now you may have another question. “How could she be tried twice on the same charges?” And another: “Isn’t that double jeopardy?”
 
You know, I would have thought so. But then, I’m not an attorney, I’m a retired schoolteacher. So what do I know?
 
Anyhow…here is my question for the day. And it’s about what people were wearing or were assumed to be wearing on the night Margery Landry broke into the house of Elsa’s ex-husband.
 
You see, some “knowledgeable” person or other had told the media that Elsa had threatened to dress all in black and shoot her then-husband. So, apparently, in court this came to the attention of the judge and jury and the prosecution made much of it. The prosecution pointed out that Margery Landry, who broke into the house of “AS,” now Elsa’s ex-husband and found him in bed, nearly naked, with his younger son, who was completely naked–the prosecution pointed out that Margery Landry was wearing all black, and that this tied in with the “threat” made by Elsa.
 
Two things wrong with that argument by the prosecution:
  1. Elsa never made such a threat.
  2. Margery Landry was not dressed in black. Landry wore tan pants, a green shirt and tan shoes.
Duh! If the prosecution fell into that error headfirst, how many others did Katherine Winfree fall into? And doesn’t this raise some reasonable doubt about Elsa’s guilt? I sure does for me!